Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 3, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00679Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRCT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION APRIL CLARK ) CASE NO. 1:20-CCV-00679-JDG ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) JONATHAN D. GREENBERG COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ) ORDER Plaintiff April Clark (“Plaintiff” or “Clark”) challenges the final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul,1 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for a Period of Disability (“POD”) and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423, and 1381 et…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. David Bowen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API