Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Stewart Associates, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 17, 1996No. 95 C 3714PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Class Certification Against SAI, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.1

BACKGROUND

Defendant Meadows Credit Union (“Meadows”) is a federal credit union which makes ear loans to its members. Defendant Stewart Associates Incorporated (“SAI”) acts as an agent for American Security Insurance Company, which provides collateral protection insurance, also known as force placed insurance, to credit unions.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Patterson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Clarence C. Trotter v. Paul J. Klincar, Individually and as Acting Chairman of the Prison Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marquis v. Tecumseh Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  2. Williams v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. Ruiz v. Stewart Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Exhaust Unlimited, Inc. v. Cintas Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2004
  5. Marshall v. H & R Block Tax Services Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API