Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1991No. 73451Published

1DissentHunter, Chief Judge

I cannot agree with the majority opinion which finds the negligence of Appellant’s attorney to be “good cause” sufficient to justify waiver of the ten-day filing requirement of 40 O.S.1981 § 2-610. Neither can I agree that, under the circumstances, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to accept the attorney’s negligence as “good cause”.

The refusal to allow a pleading to be filed out of time will be disturbed only in a case of a clear abuse of discretion and an abuse of discretion by the trial court will not be presumed on appeal. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Chez, 527 P.2d 165…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. American Bank of Commerce v. ChavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company v. ChezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. In Re Crane's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Continental Supply Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API