Best v. Safeguard Ins. Co. of N.Y.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
Action of assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance covering household goods. The court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1363.40.
The facts, as they appear in evidence from the relevant parts of the pleadings, offered and admitted, and from the testimony, may be stated as follows:
The household goods of the plaintiff, while contained in a dwelling rented by her from Charles Camarata, were on April 12, 1932, destroyed or seriously damaged by fire. She had two policies of insurance on them, one for $3000 in the defendant company and one for $2000 in Northern…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Livingstone v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Hill v. Cumberland Valley Mutual Protection Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Millville Mutual Fire Ins. v. WilgusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.