Legal Opinion

People v. Platnick

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1945No. Crim. 3942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

In an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County defendants were accused of the crime of burglary. Defendant Platnick was also charged with a prior conviction of the offense of. burglary and the defendant Frabasilio with two prior felony convictions, one for the offense of burglary and the other for petty theft with a prior felony conviction. Motions made by each defendant to set aside the information under section 995 of the Penal Code were denied; they each entered pleas of not guilty and denied the prior convictions. Subsequently all prior convictions were duly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. WallerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. DraperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. McCabeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. GoodallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. FleigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API