Conrad v. Larson

The plaintiff (appellant), William W. Conrad, appeals from a final order denying the plaintiff specific performance of a land purchase contract.

The sole question on appeal is whether the chancellor erred in denying specific performance as prayed for by the plaintiff.

It is a well established rule of law that the chancellor’s findings of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellant court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Pokress v. Josephart, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 756; Bittner v. Walsh, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 799; Clausi v.…