Legal Opinion

Smith v. Vosika

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1926No. 25,016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 208 N.W. 1. The complaint charged the defendant with a breach of his contract to procure a purchaser for a farm at a stated price. The demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff appeals.

The controversy was here before upon a complaint charging the defendant with inducing the plaintiff to enter into a contract of purchase by a fraudulent promise to sell at an advance. Smith v. Vosika, 163 Minn. 12, 203 N.W. 428.

The defendant was the selling agent of the owner of a quarter section farm in Renville county. The plaintiff was negotiating with the defendant for the purchase of it. As a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Moore v. DaiberMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Etscheid v. TiefenthalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Witt v. John Blomquist, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Ratelle v. SiebenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API