Smith v. Vosika
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 208 N.W. 1. The complaint charged the defendant with a breach of his contract to procure a purchaser for a farm at a stated price. The demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff appeals.
The controversy was here before upon a complaint charging the defendant with inducing the plaintiff to enter into a contract of purchase by a fraudulent promise to sell at an advance. Smith v. Vosika, 163 Minn. 12, 203 N.W. 428.
The defendant was the selling agent of the owner of a quarter section farm in Renville county. The plaintiff was negotiating with the defendant for the purchase of it. As a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vaughan v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Moore v. DaiberMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Etscheid v. TiefenthalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. VosikaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Witt v. John Blomquist, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Ratelle v. SiebenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975