Legal Opinion

Fannessey v. Fannessey

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 23, 1880Published

APPEAL FROM KENTON CHANCERY COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

In Hobbs v. Blandford, 7 T. B. Mon. 469; Petty v. Petty, 4 B. Mon. 215; McAfee v. Ferguson, 9 B. Mon. 475; Leach v. Duvall, 8 Bush 201, and Cheshire v. Payne, 16 B. Mon. 618, this court has announced the general doctrine that facts such as are set out in the petition in this case entitle the defrauded husband or wife to relief. These facts make out a prima facie case, and if there be any other facts which rendered that legal which, on the statements of the petition, is fraudulent and illegal, they should be pleaded by way of defense. ' ^

Neither the husband who was guilty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petty v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
  2. Leach v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  3. Cheshire v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855
  4. McAfee v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API