Legal Opinion

Alloy Products Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 9, 1962No. 50187PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks judgment on the ground that the defendant has been unjustly enriched as a result of coercion and duress alleged to have been exercised by defendant’s officials, particularly a Mr. Moore, which plaintiff claims induced its execution of the 1944 renegotiation agreement, and by virtue of a mistake of law in interpretation of the covenant against contingent fees contained in the contract. Plaintiff asks this court to exercise its equitable jurisdiction to reform the 1944 renegotiation agreement and to render judgment in behalf of petitioner in the sum of $85,000.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Mildred S. Curry v. Pyramid Life Insurance Company and Home Savings Association of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  3. Du Puy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Shillman v. HobstetterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. In the Matter of a Motion to Compel Arbitration Between Hellenic Lines, Ltd., and Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. A & G Const. Co., Inc. v. Reid Brothers Logging Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API