Legal Opinion

Leghart v. Montour Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1959No. Appeals, Nos. 24, 25, and 26PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bok,

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, have verdicts for personal injuries which the Court below sustained. Defendant asks for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

The accident happened at a crossing, at a time when the road was being used as a detour for Route U. S. 30. It was between three and four in the morning, rain was falling, and the road was black-topped. Plaintiffs, driving northwest on the detour, crossed a small bridge and at once came to defendant’s tracks, which crossed the detour at right angles. Immediately beyond the tracks the road ended in an irregular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baran v. Reading Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Seeherman v. Wilkes-Barre Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Glaister v. Eazor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. O'Brien v. Jeannette BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Riester v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Pressler v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Laureeta D. Stevens v. Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company v. Laureeta D. StevensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  4. Breznicky v. Kmart Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
  5. Betty Jane Goss, of the Estate of Iva Merriman, Deceased v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API