Legal Opinion
Singh v. 49 East 96 Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about September 27, 2000, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and granted defendant and third-party plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on its claim for contractual indemnification against third-party defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court properly determined that plaintiff construction worker was not a recalcitrant worker for failing to wear a hard hat at the time a piece of metal fell from above and struck…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mangano v. American Stock Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rosa v. R.H. Macy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amato v. Rock-McGraw, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Fundus v. ScarolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Fundus v. ScarolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Peters v. Structure Tone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Mercado v. Caithness Long Island LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.