Lyndall v. Fidelity Storage & Warehouse Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
In this action of assumpsit the plaintiff recovered a verdict. The court subsequently entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. In considering the case all the evidence and inferences therefrom favorable to plaintiff must be taken as true, and 'all unfavorable to him, depending solely upon testimony, must be rejected: Fuller v. Stewart Coal Co., 268 Pa. 328. In this light we state the facts of the case.
The defendant is in the storage warehouse business in the City of Philadelphia. It maintains its warehouse at 1811-1819 Market Street, composed, at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickey v. . MorrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Duffy v. York Haven Water & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Hatchett v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Fuller v. Stewart Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Wiley v. LockeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Madison-Kipp Corp. v. Price Battery Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Wolf v. Buffalo House Wrecking & Salvage Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1927