Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1991No. 17406PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Movant entered a plea of guilty to stealing, sodomy and armed criminal action. He received consecutive terms of imprisonment of 5 years, 25 years and 25 years. Thereafter, movant filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief under Rule 24.035. An attorney was appointed to represent him and filed an amended motion. Following an evidentiary hearing the trial court made findings of fact, conclusions of law and entered judgment denying the motion.

Appellate review is to determine if the trial court’s determination is clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). Movant had the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sloan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. McMahon v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Brummell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. McCall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. McCoo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Cross v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. VivoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Soto v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API