Legal Opinion

Township of Fergus Falls v. City of Fergus Falls

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1984No. CX-83-1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The township of Fergus Falls appeals from a district court’s decision affirming the order of the Minnesota Municipal Board which allowed the city of Fergus Falls to proceed with an annexation of a part of the township without a referendum. We reverse and remand to the board so that a referendum may be held.

FACTS

On May 2, 1974, the city of Fergus Falls (“city”) and the township of Fergus Falls (“township”) adopted a joint resolution for orderly annexation of areas within the township. Paragraph nine of that agreement states:

Notwithstanding any other provision of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Joint Resolution of WatertownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re the Joint Resolution of WatertownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. In Re the Joint Resolution of WatertownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range PlanningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Op. Atty. Gen. 484a-1, Minnesota Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API