Legal Opinion

Hillard v. Guidant Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1999No. 3:98-cv-02077PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MUNLEY, District Judge.

Before the court for disposition is the plaintiffs’ motion to transfer. The plaintiffs are Devices for Life, Inc. (hereinafter “DFL”), Ronald Hillard and Thomas McGrath, Jr., and the defendants are Gui-dant Corporation and Sulzer Intermedies, Inc. 1 The matter has been fully briefed and is thus ripe for disposition.

Background

Plaintiffs brought the instant action against the defendants, for conduct which occurred during Guidant Corporation’s acquisition of Sulzer Intermedies, Inc., for whom the plaintiffs had been sales representatives under a Sales…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Fitzgerald v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Mowrey v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Austin v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Forester v. Elk Towing Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coppola v. Ferrellgas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Liggett Group Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. TriState HVAC Equipment, LLP v. Big Belly Solar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. HOEFLING v. ALTRIA GROUP, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Petroleum Service Company, Inc. v. Santie's Wholesale Oil CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API