Legal Opinion · Dissent

Middleton v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20130395Published

1DissentKapsner, Justice

[¶ 23] I respectfully dissent from part IIIC of the majority opinion. Light’s procedurally deficient new trial motion precluded all substantive review of Middleton’s appellate claims. Therefore, prejudice should be presumed, ineffective assistance of counsel should be found, the district court’s order should be reversed, and the case should be remanded with leave for Middleton to file a new motion for a new trial.

[¶ 24] Middleton argues he should not be required to show prejudice, and there should be a presumption of prejudice because Light’s procedurally deficient motion constructively…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Whiteman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. MiddletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. MiddletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. HeckelsmillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API