Legal Opinion

Sinsheimer v. William Skinner Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1894Published

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

Appellee brought an action of assumpsit against appellant.

In the prtecipe, summons and declaration, originally filed in this case, appellant, Simon Sinsheimer, is the only defendant designated. Appellee filed the common counts, originally, with an affidavit of claim thereto attached, to which appellant filed the general issue with an affidavit of merits. Subsequently, in 1891, appellee obtained leave to' file four additional counts, in each of which it was specially averred and declared, substantially, that Simon Sinsheimer and Samuel Sinsheimer were copartners, doing business under the firm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Avery v. Inhabitants of TyringhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Swigart v. WeareAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  3. McDonald v. Western Refrigerating Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Murphy v. CressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  5. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. WieczorekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API