Abell v. Modern Woodmen of America
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Stearns, county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and, findings in favor of defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action by the father to recover $1,000 on a certificate issued by the-defendant, a fraternal mutual benefit society, to his son, Clarence J. *495Abell, hereafter referred to as the insured. The facts are not in dispute. The trial court made findings of fact, based upon the admissions in the pleadings and the stipulation of the parties, and as a conclusion of law directed judgment for the defendant on the merits. The plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The sole question for our decision is whether the facts found sustained the conclusions of law. The facts, briefly…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Modern Woodmen of America v. WeekleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hendrickson v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Logan v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Hexom v. Knights of Maccabees of the WorldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Modern Woodmen of America v. TalbotNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.