Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth ex rel. Fairman v. Cavell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 203Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. The single legal question of importance is whether appellant, when entering his guilty plea, understandingly and intelligently waived his con-, stitutional right to counsel. In my opinion, it is clear that the Commonwealth failed to sustain its burden of proving that appellant did intelligently and understandingly waive this right.

The facts may be set out briefly:

*164On December 29, 1960, appellant was apprehended by the Pennsylvania State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Lock v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. BotulaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Brown Et Ux. v. BahlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. One 1941 Plymouth SedanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API