Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Bonnell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1938No. 2397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BENNETT, J.

A judgment for plaintiff-appellee in the Court of Common Pleas in this case was originally reversed by this court because of an error in the charge. It has since been shown that the transcript of the charge was erroneous and that the charge actually given did not contain that particular error shown in the original bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions has been corrected in that respect and a rehearing was allowed.

On rehearing the first error relied upon by the appellant is the fact that the court charged the “assured clear distance” statute under the . circumstances…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slocumb v. WurstOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wade, Admx. v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Behrens v. WarrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API