Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Universal-Rundle Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1967No. 101PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
The question presented by this case is whether the Court of Appeals exceeded its authority as a reviewing court by postponing the operation of a Federal Trade Commission cease-and-desist order against respondent until an investigation should be made of alleged industry-wide violations of the price discrimination provisions of the Clayton Act, § 2, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U. S. C. § 13.
Respondent Universal-Rundle produces a full line of china and cast-iron plumbing fixtures which it sells to customers located throughout the United States. In 1960,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Universal-Rundle Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
3Cited by100 opinions
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- David M. Foster v. Lawrence J. Walsh, Clerk, Akron Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Sterling Drug Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Stanley J. Marshall, United States of America v. Richard L. Chapman, John M. Schoenecker, and Patrick BrummCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.