Florida Bar v. Mirk
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent R. Patrick Mirk be found guilty of professional misconduct and disbarred. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons discussed herein, we approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations of guilt, as well as the referee’s recommended discipline. Accordingly, we disbar Mirk from the practice of law in Florida.
BACKGROUND
The Bar filed a two-count complaint against Mirk, alleging that he violated several of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar Rules). A referee was appointed. After holding a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. TravisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. BatistaSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- The Florida Bar v. BarleySupreme Court of Florida · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Florida Bar v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- The Florida Bar v. Dennis L. HortonSupreme Court of Florida · 2019