Legal Opinion

Crosby v. State Board of Hail Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1942No. 8,264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

Plaintiff, whose crop was insured under the provisions of Chapter 39, Revised Codes 1935, by the State Board of Hail Insurance, brought this action against the Board to recover the sum of $2,200, that sum being the amount of loss he claimed to have sustained by reason of a hail storm on the 21st day of June, 1940. Trial was had before a jury and verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,100, and judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. From the record these facts appear:

Within the time provided in the statute after the hail storm in question, plaintiff notified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vincent v. Germah InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Produce Refrigerating Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. People ex rel. Bliss v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. MahoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bennett v. MahoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. National Surety Corp. v. KruseMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API