Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clymo v. United Nuclear Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1980No. 3976Published

1ConcurrenceHernandez, Judge

(specially concurring).

The plaintiff’s sole point of error is that the trial court erred in allowing the defendants’ credit for wages paid plaintiff toward the award of compensation benefits. I agree. This matter is governed by the decision of our Supreme Court in Roybal v. County of Santa Fe, 79 N.M. 99, 440 P.2d 291 (1968):

We are of the opinion that the allowance of credit is dependent on the employer’s intention, and that in determining intention, “wages” and “compensation” are to be considered in accordance with the following usage of those terms:

“. . . ‘Compensation’ of an employee in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roybal v. County of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cantrell v. Lawyers Title InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API