Shuenfeldt v. Junkermann
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa
At haw.
1Opinion of the CourtShiras, J.
On the trial of this cause before a jury, it appeared that the plaintiffs were wholesale liquor dealers, residing and doing business in Chicago, Illinois, and the defendants were druggists, residing and doing business in Dubuque, Iowa. The action was based ' upon acceptances of defendants, and upon an open account. The defendants pleaded that the acceptances, as well as the account, were for intoxicating liquors sold in violation of the statute of Iowa, commonly known as the prohibitory liquor law. On the part of the defendants it was claimed that the liquors were sold in pursuance of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Eadie, Guilford & Co. v. AshbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Lowry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Tegler & Co. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Forsyth v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Compañia General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- True v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Carmen v. Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Howard Ins. Co. of New York v. SilverbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.