Sutherland v. North Dakota Department of Human Services
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Marian Sutherland appealed from a judgment affirming a Department of Human Services’ decision that she was not disabled for purposes of receiving Medicaid benefits. We hold the Department’s disability determination must follow the Social Security Administration’s five-step process for evaluating disability. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
[¶ 2] In June 2002, after the Social Security Administration determined she did not meet the income and resource test for Supplemental Security Income and she did not have enough work…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Marie McDaniel v. Otis R. Bowen , Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Henderson v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Wahl v. Morton County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Opp v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Pladson v. Traill County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Annexation of a Part of Lewis & Clark Public Sch. Dist.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016