Legal Opinion

Bowser v. Tootle

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1990No. 07-CA-58759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLASS, Justice,

for the Court:

This is a dispute over the ownership of land. The seminal source of the problem was a conveyancing error resulting in an erroneous description on the assessment rolls and, consequently, an erroneous description in a tax sale. The sale was confirmed against those holding the last deeds of record under the erroneous description but against no one else. The Bowser title here depends on the erroneous description and on the tax sale and must fail for the reasons hereinafter set out. We affirm the Chancellor’s decision.

It is not necessary to go into the ancient history…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Queen v. QueenMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McIntosh v. McIntoshMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Overby v. CavanaughMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wilson v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Nichols v. Modern Diversified Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Interest of CBMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Eddie Orcutt v. Charles ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  3. Eddie Orcutt v. Charles ChamblissCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API