Legal Opinion

Bobby Colbert v. Ron Haynes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2020No. 19-71246PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BOBBY DARRELL COLBERT, No. 19-71246 Applicant, v. OPINION RON HAYNES, Respondent. Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

Submitted March 2, 2020 * Seattle, Washington Filed March 30, 2020 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Ryan D. Nelson, and Danielle J. Hunsaker, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Hunsaker * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 COLBERT V. HAYNES SUMMARY ** Habeas Corpus The panel denied Bobby Darrel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Gregory L. Brown v. W. MunizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Wentzell v. NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Uriel Gonzalez v. Stuart ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Colbert v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  2. Colbert v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  3. Delgado v. State of FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Jacobs v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. Kozol v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API