Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Dickinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by William H. Thomas and others against Henry A. Dickinson and others. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiffs, and from an order denying motion fora new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The complaint alleges that the defendants, with intent to deceive and defraud the plaintiffs by inducing the plaintiffs to sell goods to them, falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiffs that they were solvent, and that one of the defendants, Dickinson, was worth $50,000, and his wife was worth $200,000; that plaintiffs, relying upon- said representations, were thereby induced to sell and deliver to the defendants certain goods of the value of $1,696.82, and that the representations so made were false; that no part of the price of the goods had been paid, to the damage of the *601plaint…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Thomas v. DickinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Currier v. PoorNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Nichols v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. William A. Thomas Co. v. HolstAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API