Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Kempner

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Fbiedmah, J.

Motion by defendant for permission to serve an amended answer.

The action is against one claiming to be the widow of Emil Horowitz, deceased, for a declaration that the marriage between defendant and the deceased is void and that plaintiff is the lawful widow of said deceased. The answer is, in effect, a general denial. The proposed amended answer seeks to add a separate and distinct defense of res judicata. The answer alleges the filing by plaintiff, as the alleged widow of decedent, of a claim for payment of a lump sum death benefit with the Bureau of Old Age and Survivor’s Insurance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Borgos v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gurge v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. In re the Estate of MillsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leutloff v. LeutloffNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API