Legal Opinion

Gloster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1992No. 90-01943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONOVER, Judge.

The appellant, Christopher Gloster, challenges the judgments and sentences im*1345posed upon him after a jury found him guilty, as charged, of two counts of robbery with a firearm, seven counts of false imprisonment, and one count of grand theft. We find that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the false imprisonment charges and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial on those charges. We find no merit in any of the appellant’s other contentions and, therefore, affirm the trial court in all other respects.

During the jury instruction conference held in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WimberlySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. SanbornSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Shelby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Chaeld v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nutter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API