Legal Opinion
Odemns v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 2007No. 02-CV-354PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, Tanya L. Odemns, appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment to appellees, the District of Columbia (District) and District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (WASA), on her complaint for negligence against appellees. In granting the motion, the trial court concluded that neither the District nor WASA had a duty to Odemns for the condition of a manhole cover on privately owned property which she alleged caused her to fall and sustain injuries. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in its ruling because: (1) WASA has a duty to inspect and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Neuberger v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Gilbert v. MiodovnikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Rodriguez v. Laboratory Corp. of America HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Lincoln Hockey, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.