Legal Opinion
United States v. Mikulski
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 31, 2003No. 01-4169PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
Joseph Russell Mikulski was charged in a one-count indictment with possession of stolen mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. After the district court denied Mr. Mikul-ski’s motion to suppress, Mr. Mikulski entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge. Mr. Mikulski received a sentence of sixty months of imprisonment. He now appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He argues that the evidence should be suppressed because (1) the officers exceeded their jurisdictional authority when they arrested him; (2) the officers lacked reasonable suspicion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Terry L. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. John Henry MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Swanson v. Town of Mountain View, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ManjarrezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Bowling v. RectorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.