Bobbitt v. Van Eaton
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Grabe-, J.
Plaintiff in his petition at law predicates his recovery on contract, partly in writing and partly oral. No dispute arises as to any phase of the written instruments involved in the pleadings or the evidence. It is only the alleged oral agreements which provoke the legal quarrel. The trial court, in one of the instructions given, correctly puts the issue in the following language:
“And the only material matters for you to determine in this case are those relating to the alleged oral conversations and contracts set out by the respective parties.' ’
The facts disclose that, on the 11th day of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farmers Savings Bank v. Burr Forbes & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Hendrickson v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Johnson v. Ashland Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1879