Legal Opinion

Bindert v. Elmhurst Taxi Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided August 30, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

The issues herein have been duly submitted upon an agreed state of facts and present a novel question of law.

Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of operating taxicabs for hire. On the 26th day of April, 1937, one of defendant’s cabs, operated by one Whelan, was hailed by another cab driver, Cohen, who stated that his (Cohen’s) cab had been stolen, and, jumping in, directed Whelan to pursue Cohen’s cab, which was still in sight. It is conceded that Cohen had no intention to become a fare-paying passenger and also that Whelan did not pull down the meter-flag to register a fare.

*893The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Cosgrove v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Wyllie v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bose v. United Employment Agencies, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  2. Bernstein v. Western Union Telegraph Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API