Legal Opinion

Tennant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 11, 1927No. 3492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The present case arises was before this court in Tennant v. New York, 286 F. 932. A reference to that case and to the opinion of the court below, which is printed in the margin, 1 sufficiently explains the present appeal. We have care-

fully considered the case, and, finding as we do that there was a timely and sufficient proof of the claims made, and the opinion of the court below so adequately and properly discussing and deciding the additional questions involved in this appeal, we restrict our action to adopting such opinion, and on it affirm the decree.

1

On April…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carnegie Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. Carnegie Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Tennant v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FeibusDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. FlanaganDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1939
  3. In Re MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. United Bonding Insurance Company v. SteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Tyson-Long Co. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API