Legal Opinion

Wicker v. City of Maplewood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1985No. CX-85-1014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

FACTS

Appellant Robert Wicker, appearing pro se, brought an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal action against the City of Maplewood. Wicker alleged that the prosecution of a citation for failure to display current automobile registration was malicious in that he was neither the driver, operator, nor owner of the vehicle which was cited. Upon trial, the jury by special verdict found that respondent did not institute criminal proceedings against appellant, did not have probable cause to believe appellant was guilty, did not act maliciously, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wicker v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API