Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Wietzikoski

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided October 30, 1992No. 10-91-173-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*102OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

The question presented is whether a person claiming to be the natural father of a child who has a “presumed father” can maintain a suit to establish his paternity. We will follow the decision of the Beaumont Court of Appeals in holding that section 11.03(a)(7) of the Family Code violates the due-course-of-law clause of article I, section 19, of the Texas Constitution. See Tex. Const. art. I, § 19; Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 11.03(a)(7) (Vernon Supp.1992); Gibson v. In the Interest of J.W.T., 815 S.W.2d 863, 869 (Tex.App. — Beaumont 1991, writ granted). We also determine that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In the Interest of McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Barnett v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. D.B.S. v. M.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. Henderson v. Wietzikoski, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
  4. In the Interest of J.W.T.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In the Interest of J.W.T.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API