Legal Opinion

Willman v. Texaco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1976No. 8591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Ruby Willman filed suit for personal injuries, which she alleged occurred, when she was struck by a falling pipe at the Richland Hills Texaco Station. Defendants are Claude Faubus, Texaco, Inc., and Sam E. Fox. Faubus was the operator leasing the station from Texaco, Inc. Fox was one of two owners of the land who leased the building and land to Texaco, Inc., and was Texaco’s consignee. Fox also had an agreement with Faubus concerning the operation of the station. Texaco, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment contending that Faubus was an independent contractor.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Texas Co. v. WheatTexas Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. TidwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. O'NEILL v. Startex Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Edwards v. Neely Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Ahn v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Exxon Corp. v. TidwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API