Legal Opinion

Meehan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 1988No. 87-0907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

526 So.2d 1083 (1988)

John MEEHAN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0907.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 29, 1988.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm appellant's conviction but remand this cause for resentencing because of the trial court's failure to make a specific finding that enhanced sentencing under the habitual offender statute is necessary…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Elliott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Pugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API