Meehan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
526 So.2d 1083 (1988)
John MEEHAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-0907.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 29, 1988.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm appellant's conviction but remand this cause for resentencing because of the trial court's failure to make a specific finding that enhanced sentencing under the habitual offender statute is necessary…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Hopkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
4Cited by9 opinions
- Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Elliott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Pugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.