Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Anstey v. Davis

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1998No. 25155-25158Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, Chief Justice

(Filed Dec. 14, 1998)

The disposition of this case by the majority opinion is legally correct, and I embrace it wholeheartedly. I have chosen to write separately only for the purpose of clarifying a point regarding limitations on the use of the habeas corpus petition.

A Habeas Corpus Petition Is Appropriate Only When A Prisoner Seeks Actual Release From Custody

In the past, this Court has allowed “conditions” of incarceration to form the basis for a habeas corpus proceeding. However, we have previously addressed conditions of incarceration in relation to a habeas petition, only in the context of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harrah v. LeveretteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Crain v. BordenkircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Pingley v. CoinerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. K. W. v. WernerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hickson v. KellisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API