Legal Opinion

Sena v. Town of Greenfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1997Published

1Dissent

Mikoll, J. P. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent.

The jury’s verdict should be affirmed. The protection of General Obligations Law § 9-103 (1) (b) was properly foreclosed to Town of Greenfield (hereinafter defendant). The evidence disclosed that defendant had a Town park located on Bockes Road. There was a sign posted there designating the area as a Town park. It included a pavilion and a baseball field. Defendant had declared the area to be a Town park by Town Board resolution. Although defendant had not fully implemented its master plan for the park, it had obviously incorporated the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferres v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Giordano v. Shanty Hollow Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. P.W.B. Enterprises, Inc. v. Moklam Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Cornell v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API