Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Travelers Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 27, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

Defendant moves under Rule 34, 28 U. S.C.A., to inspect and copy the hospital record and physician’s records with respect to plaintiff’s decedent.

Plaintiff opposes the motion on the grounds that:

“(1) The hospital record is part of the attorney's work-product and(2) It does not have possession, custody, or control of the physician’s records.”

Plaintiff’s counsel affirms that he has photostatic copies of the hospital record, but that neither he nor plaintiff possesses copies of the physician’s records.

Defendant, pursuant to Rule 26, has already taken the depositions of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Martinez v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
  5. Leszynski v. RussDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API