Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gore v. Bachman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1935No. 2505PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BODEY, J.

It is the claim of the relator that this action may be maintained by reason of the holding of this court in the case of State ex Morgan v Stevenson, 39 Oh Ap, 355 (10 Abs 278; 10 Abs 616). Counsel for the respondent in support of their demurrer rely upon the case of Martin v Bircher, 46 Oh Ap, 239, (15 Abs 115), being a case decided by the Appellate court of the Fifth District.

It will be noted from an examination of the first paragraph of this petition that no facts are set forth therein concerning the terms or conditions of the contract of purchase except the- amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. BircherOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. State, Ex Rel. Morgan v. StevensonOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Morgan v. StevensonOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huddleston v. WardCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API