Legal Opinion

Coal & Iron Nat. Bank of New York v. Suzuki

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 1924No. 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Obviously Suzuki could not recover upon all of the pleaded causes of action. The denial of motions to dismiss all but one of the causes of action must have been error; but, both parties having finally moved for a directed verdict, both are concluded by whatever finding the court made. Beuttell v. Magone, 157 U. S. 154, 15 S. Ct. 566, 39 L. Ed. 654. To the same effect, Bank of the State v. Southern Bank, 170 N. Y. 1, 62 N. E. 677. In favor of the verdict, therefore, it is the duty of this court to sustain the judgment if, upon any view of the testimony, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. San Diego County v. California Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pan-American Bank & Trust Co. v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Ralston Purina Company v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Pan-American Bank & Trust Co. v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Ralston Purina Company v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API