Legal Opinion
People v. Katz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 9, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*858OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment of conviction rendered August 7, 1985 affirmed.
We find that a corporation may be the subject and victim of aggravated harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.30. That statute provides in relevant part:
"A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he:
"1. Communicates, or causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise, with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone * * * in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. DupontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. LammNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
4Cited by9 opinions
- Andrew J. Schlagler v. Francis D. Phillips, Ii, District Attorney of Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Vives v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Vives v. The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Katz v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- People ex rel. Shaffer v. KuhlmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.