Legal Opinion

People v. Katz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 9, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*858OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment of conviction rendered August 7, 1985 affirmed.

We find that a corporation may be the subject and victim of aggravated harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.30. That statute provides in relevant part:

"A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he:
"1. Communicates, or causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise, with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone * * * in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. DupontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. LammNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrew J. Schlagler v. Francis D. Phillips, Ii, District Attorney of Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Vives v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Vives v. The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Katz v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. People ex rel. Shaffer v. KuhlmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API