Legal Opinion

Main Seneca Corp. v. Town of Amherst Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1998No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: At the outset, we note that petitioners appeal from an order that was subsumed in a subsequent judgment. In our discretion, we treat the appeal as taken from the judgment *931(see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988).

Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding alleging, inter alia, that two separate determinations of respondent Town of Amherst Industrial Development Agency…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Main Seneca Corp. v. Town of Amherst Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Mohawk Group, L.P. v. Town of Amherst Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Main Seneca Corp. v. Erie County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API