White v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
PER CURIUM:
Upon consideration of the Petition for Rehearing in the above-entitled causes, we are of the opinion that there has been no misconception of the questions presented by the appeals. The rights and liabilities of the parties, dependent as they are upon the Acts of Congress, the bills of lading, and the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court, have been correctly determined in the opinion herein, which points out the inapplicability here of the decisions in Anderson v. A. C. L. R. Co., 163 S. C., 350, 161 S. E., 523, and Union Pacific R. Co. v. Burke, 255 U.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Anderson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- J. B. Colt Co. v. KinardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923