Legal Opinion

Wise v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1986No. 72075PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape and appeals on several grounds, including violation of his constitutional rights through the prejudicial striking of all black jurors through the use of peremptory challenges.

In this case appellant made timely objection to removal of all black persons on the venire by the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges. Because the trial court rejected the objection without requiring the prosecutor to give an explanation for his actions, we remand the case for further proceedings pursuant to the principles enunciated in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. _…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chew v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Barton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Mincey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API