Legal Opinion
Cate v. United States
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided January 25, 1966No. Civ. A. 3229-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for personal injuries sustained while he was employed by Dynalectron Corporation for the purpose of making alterations to aircraft at Brookley Air Force Base in Mobile, Alabama. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to Title 28, Sec. 1346(b), 2671 et seq., U.S.C.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The third-party defendant, Dynalec-tron Corporation, contracted to make certain aircraft modifications at Brookley Air Force Base. The defendant government furnished the plaintiff a two-foot high platform on which to stand while working on aircraft. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mostyn v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Batson-Cook Co. v. Industrial Steel ErectorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sand v. Southeast State BankDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
- Crocker-Citizens National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1970
- George Epcar Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Mary Ellen Pemberton v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970